Résumé :
The article offers a morphological and lexical analysis of two Post-Classical
aorist forms of the verb πίπτω, i.e. the aorist passive ἐπτώθην and the sigmatic first
aorist ἔπτωσα, which have sometimes led to confusion among both ancient and modern
scholars. These Late Antique and Medieval formations are examined in a diachronic
perspective with attention to their syntactic functions and semantic values through
their occurences in the Byzantine literature. Furthermore, a hypothetical analogical
future *πτώσω is discussed since, although it was included in the paradigm of πίπτω
in several Ancient Greek lexica and grammars between the 17th and the 19th century,
it does not seem to find any evidence in Ancient and Medieval Greek literary sources