Pinakes | Πίνακες
Textes et manuscrits grecs
Siècle : 13
Date : 1230 ca-1297
Formes équivalentes :
- Jean XI, patriarche de Constantinople
Oeuvres :
| Titre | Rôle | Ordo | Remarque | TLG | RAP | Mots clefs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Opera | 0005 |
|
||||
| De unione ecclesiarum | 0010 | This work was composed by Bekkos when he was patriarch of Constantinople (1275-1282), to sustain and promote the union of the Churches that was in effect at the time. PG 141, 16-157 |
|
|
|
|
| Aduersus eos qui dictum sancti Cyrilli proponunt | 0020 | Leo Allatius printend this work as the twelfth chapter of the "De processione Spiritus Sancti" by the same author, but in fact it constitutes an independent work. PG 141, 249-276 |
|
|
|
|
| Apologia | 0030 | As suggested by Laurent and Darrouzès, this oration was very likely composed during Bekkos' patriarchate. PG 141, 1009-1020 |
|
|
|
|
| De pace ecclesiastica | 0040 | Laurent and Darrouzès date this work immediately after Bekkos' election to the patriarchate (1275-1276). Two different redactions of this text are preserved. Bekkos says that this writing, which is an historical demonstration on the necessity of Church union, is the first half of a two-parts demonstration: the second one, dedicated to the theological argumentation, is the "De processione Spiritus Sancti". PG 141, 925-942 (partial edition) |
|
|
|
|
| De processione Spiritus Sancti | 0050 | This work, composed by 11 chapters, was conceived by the author as the second half of a two-parts demonstration, the first one being the "De pace ecclesiastica". Leo Allatius, and therefore Migne in the PG, printed as the 12th chapter what constitutes instead an independent writing, the "Adversus eos qui dictum". PG 141, 157-249 |
|
|
|
|
| Aduersus Andronici Camateri animaduersiones | 0060 | This work, written by John Bekkos during his patriarchate, was partially rewritten and abridged after the destitution and condemnation of the author, as asserted by Bekkos himself in the "De libris suis". Both recensions are preserved by the manuscript tradition. PG 141, 395-614 (partial edition). |
|
|
|
|
| Refutationes syllogismorum Camateri | 0070 | This work has not been published yet. It presents the refutation of the syllogisms against the Latin doctrine on the procession of the Holy Spirit contained in the first part of the Sacred Arsenal by Andronicus Kamateros. |
|
|
|
|
| Refutatio syllogismorum uariorum auctorum | 0080 | This work is still unpublished. It is structured as a sequence of thirty syllogismoi, extracted from different authors and numbered from α' to λ' ; after each syllogismos follows the respective refutation (antirrhesis). |
|
|
|
|
| Refutatio Photiani libri de Sancto Spiritu | 0090 | This text consists of a series of excerpts from ps.-Photius' Mystagogy (keimenon), each of them followed by the respective refutation (antirrhesis). PG 141, 728-864 (ed.: D. J. Hergenroether). |
|
|
|
|
| Refutatio capitulorum Georgii Moschampar | 0100 | This text is unpublished. The title defines it as the refutation of some 'chapters without title'; however, the excerpts cited by Bekkos - each of whom is followed by the respective reply (apantesis) - can be identified as passages of the Capita antirrhetica contra Beccum by George Moschampar. |
|
|
|
|
| Epigraphae | 0110 | PG 141, 613-724 |
|
|
|
|
| Florilegium patristicum de processione Spiritus Sancti | Auteur supposé (tradition manuscrite) | 0120 | This florilegium is still unpublished. |
|
|
|
| Refutatio libri Georgii Cyprii | 0130 |
|
||||
| Epistulae | 0140 |
|
||||
| De depositione sua oratio I | 0150 | This text, addressed to the patriarchs of Alexandria and Antioch, is probably to be identified with the letter written between January 1283 and February 1284 from Bursa, during his first exile, asking for a new and more fair trial (Ragia 2016). Metochites and Meliteniotes refer to it as an encyclical letter. PG 141, 949-970 |
|
|
|
|
| De depositione sua oratio II | 0160 | PG 141, 969-1010 |
|
|
|
|
| Testamentum | 0170 | PG 141, 1027-1032 (partial edition) |
|
|
|
|
| De libris suis | 0180 | The incipit of this text suggests that it was conceived as a letter sent to his friend, Theodore, along with an autograph manuscript that contained a revised version of some of the works composed during the patriarchate. PG 141, 1019-1028 |
|
|
|
|
| Sententia synodalis | 0200 |
|
||||
| De gradibus consanguinitatis | 0210 |
|
||||
| De ordine Trinitatis personarum | 0220 |
|
||||
| De sancto synodo quae Photium restituit | 0230 |
|
